Allowed
Adinath Trimbak Varpe v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/3752/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.3752 of 2013 In Criminal Appeal Stamp No.283 of 2013
Adinath S/o Trimbak Varpe.
.. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent.
Shri. Rajendra D. Sanap, Advocate, for the applicant.
Smt. Y.M. Kshirsagar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 5th AUGUST 2013
ORDER:
Sd/- Sd/- (A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
Adinath S/o Trimbak Varpe
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court