Criminal Application withdrawn by applicant; High Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the application accordingly.
Leave to withdraw application granted; criminal application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.2811 of 2013
Ajit s/o Anilrao Warpudkar. .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Another. .. Respondents.
Shri. S.S. Rathi, Advocate, for the applicant.
Shri. S.G. Nandedkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.1.
Shri. V.L. Dhoble, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 5th AUGUST 2013
ORDER:
Sd/- Sd/- (A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
Ajit s/o Anilrao Warpudkar
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
