Criminal Application disposed on the ground that a charge-sheet had been filed. Applicant directed to resort to appropriate legal remedies.
Applicant directed to resort to appropriate remedies permissible in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.2564 of 2013
Shital w/o Satish Pund.
.. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. C.A. Jadhav, Advocate, holding for Shri. P.S. Pawar, Advocate, for the applicant. Shri. S.D. Kaldate, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.1.
Shri. K.J. Tandale, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 to 9.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 5th AUGUST 2013
ORDER:
Sd/- Sd/-
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
Shital w/o Satish Pund
The State of Maharashtra
Naresh H Patil
A.I.S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
