Santabai Tukaram Etubone v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought pension via writ petition; court disposed of petition as claim granted by respondents subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 875 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or Coram: B. R. Gavai, and directions and the Registrar's Sunil P. Deshmukh, JJ. orders. Date: 19.3.2012
Shri Pramod B. Gapat Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri K.M. Suryawanshi A.G.P. for Resp.Nos. 1 and 3.
Shri B.B. Kulkarni Adv. for Respondent No. 2
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R.Gavai, J.)
pnd/wp-875.12
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 and 3
Respondent No. 2
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. R. Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court