Petition directed Respondent No.2 (Collector) to decide an appeal filed by the petitioner against an order of Respondent No.1 within two months.
Direction to decide the appeal within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1792 OF 2012
Jeevan Abhajirao Ghogre ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Collector, Nanded & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr Amol S. Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for respondents.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 19th March, 2012
PER COURT :
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the appeal filed by the present petitioner, within a stipulated period.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
(B. R. GAVAI, J.)
amj/wp1792.12
Jeevan Abhajirao Ghogre
The Collector, Nanded
B. R. GAVAI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
