This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.4263 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5270 OF 2011
Prerana Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and anr.
..APPLICANTS
VERSUS
Ajit Madanrao Doke & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr U.V. Jawalikar, Advocate for the applicants; Mr N.P. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.1; Mr V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 19th March, 2012
PER COURT :
For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
(B.R. GAVAI, J.)
amj/cast4263.12
Prerana Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
Ajit Madanrao Doke
B.R. GAVAI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
