The court allowed the civil application to permit applicants to intervene in Writ Petition No. 8896 of 2011 and listed the petition for hearing.
The applications were permitted to intervene in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca1592.12
-1-
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1592 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 8896 OF 2011
________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
Mr. S.P. Tiwari h/f Mr. N.L. Chaudhari, advocate for the applicants
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 16TH MARCH, 2012 .....
P.C. :-
rlj/
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) (B.R. GAVAI, J.)
Applicants
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
