This writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner appeared unrepresented and expressed no interest in continuing the matter.
None granted; Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP795-06
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 795/2006
(VASHILA RAMESH KHULSANGE VERSUS S.T. CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, NAGPUR & ANOTHER)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 .
None for the petitioner.
It appears from the order sheet that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
JUDGE
APTE
Vashila Ramesh Khulsange
S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
