This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1200-10
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1200/2010
(ABDUL NAYEEM KHAN ABDUL REHMAN KHAN VERSUS THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NAGPUR & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mrs. G. Venkatraman, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Chavhan h/f Shri C.S. Kaptan, Sr.counsel for the R-1 & 2. Shri S.J. Khandalkar, counsel for the R-3. Shri V.A. Thakre, A.G.P. for the R-4 & 5.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 .
C.A.W. NO. 2254/2012 .
The counsel for the respondents do not have any objection to the prayer made in the civil application.
The prayer made in the application is granted. The necessary amendment should be carried out within a period of one week.
The civil application is allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
APTE
Abdul Nayeem Khan
Abdul Rahman Khan
The Corporation of the City of Nagpur
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
