FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
The proposed amendment was allowed and granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2575-06
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2575/2006
(BHARATSINGH FAKIRCHAND RAJPUT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS)
Shri P.S. Khubalkar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.L. Dharmadhikari, A.G.P. for the respondents.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 .
C.A.W. NO. 2258/2012 .
Heard. Perused the contents of the application. The proposed amendment does not change the nature of the petition.
Hence, the prayer is granted. The necessary amendment should be carried out within a period of one week. The civil application is allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
APTE
Bharatsingh Fakirchand Rajput
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
