This writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on multiple adjourned dates despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP784-06
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 784/2006
(KAMLAKAR PUNDLIKRAO KHARBADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER)
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 .
None appeared for the petitioner on 16.02.2010 and 21.08.2012. On 21.08.2012, the matter was adjourned for today, as a last chance.
None appears for the petitioner, today also. The writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
JUDGE
JUDGE
APTE
KAMLAKAR PUNDLIKRAO KHARBADE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ANOTHER
VASANTI A. NAIK
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
