Criminal writ petition by petitioner seeking withdrawal of petition by appellant after investigation concluded no offence was made out; interim order vacated.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.4.12.wp67.12.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Writ Petition No.67 of 2012
[Brijpalsingh Mohansingh Thakur .vrs. The State of
Maharashtra and another]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr.Charuhas Dharmadhikari, Advocate for petitioner,
Mr.T.A.Mirza, A.P.P. for respondent no.1/State,
Mr.S.M.Bhangde, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM: A.H.JOSHI AND
SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 19th APRIL,2012.
1]Mr. Mirza, learned A.P.P. has tendered
pursis. It accompanies a letter written by
Investigating Officer to the Public Prosecutor
informing that �C� summary is in the process of
lodgment which remained pending in view of order
passed in the petition.
2]Mr. Dharmadhikari, learned Advocate for the
petitioner, states that in view of that now
investigation has reached conclusion that no offence
is made out, the purpose of filing this petition is
19.4.12.wp67.12.odt
2
served. He, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the
petition.
3]The petition is disposed of as withdrawn,
leaving liberties, if any, as available in law.
4] Interim order vacated.
JudgeJudge
Gulande
Brijpalsingh Mohansingh Thakur
State of Maharashtra
Respondent no.2
A.H.Joshi
Smt.Sadhana S.JadHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court