The High Court disposed of a criminal application for withdrawal of the petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies as available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.4.12.APL144.11.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Application [APL] No.144 of 2011
[Ms. Pamela Rohitdas d/o Late Paul Rohitdas .vrs. State of
Maharashtra and one]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Dr. Anjan De, Advocate for applicant,
Mr. M.K. Pathan, A.P.P. for respondent no.1,
Ms. Rajashri Gurnule, Advocate holding for Mr. S.S. Ghate,
Advocate for respondent no.2.
-----
CORAM: A.H.JOSHI AND
SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 18th APRIL,2012.
Heard.
Learned Advocate for the applicant prays for
permission to withdraw the petition in view of that
it was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, with liberty to avail the remedies as
available in law.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn,
keeping open the remedies, as indicated.
JudgeJudge
Gulande
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ms. Pamela Rohitdas
State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court