Dismissed
Mohammed Rehman Khan v. the State of Maharshtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/611/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cwp611.11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.611 OF 2011
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
....
Ms. V.C. Dharurkar Advocate h/f. Shri.
C.V. Dharurkar Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri. S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for Respondent
/State
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2012.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the
Petitioner, on instructions, submits that
Petitioner has died and therefore the
Petition be disposed of as being
infructuous.
2. In the light of the statement made
by the learned counsel appearing for the
cwp611.11
2
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed
of, as being infructuous.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/FEB12
Petitioner
Respondent/State
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court