Allowed
Balaji Shivkant Hatte v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/282/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra282.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.282 OF 2012 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.653 OF 2009
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.A.S. Shivpuje Advocate h/f. Shri.
A.N. Gaddime Advocate for Applicant.
Smt.V.A. Shinde, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.
Shri. G.P. Shinde Advocate for Resp. Nos.
2 to 7.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2012.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing
for the Applicant.
2. For the reasons stated in the
Application, the Application is allowed
in terms of prayer clause (B). The
Application is disposed of.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/FEB12
Applicant
Resp. No.1
Resp. Nos.2 to 7
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court