Disposed

Nikhil Chandrashekhar Deshmukh v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Aug 2012WP/4617/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions concerning student suspensions under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act were heard. The court refrained from adjudicating merits and directed the Registrar to pass appropriate orders on the petitioners' apology representation within two weeks before disposing of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Registrar to pass appropriate orders on the representation within two weeks.

Nikhil Chandrashekhar Deshmukh Vs the State of Mah… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

1 WP 4574 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

Writ Petition No.4574 of 2012

¶4

Pandurang s/o Ashok Ghuge & Others. .. Petitioners.

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Associate Dean, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Parbhani & Others. .. Respondents.

¶7

Shri. V.D. Gunale, Advocate, holding for Shri. Jitendra N Ghuge, Advocate, for petitioners.

¶8

Shri. A.S. Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 & 2.

¶9

Shri. K.M. Suryawanshi, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.3.

¶10

With

¶11

Writ Petition No.4617 of 2012

¶12

Nikhil s/o Chandrashekhar Deshmukh. .. Petitioner.

¶13

Versus

¶14

The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.

¶15

Shri. Swapnil S. Rathi, Advocate, for petitioner.

¶16

Shri. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1.

¶17

Shri. A.S. Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 & 3.

¶18

2 WP 4574 of 2012

¶19

CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE: 23^rd AUGUST 2012.

¶20

PER COURT :

¶21

Heard.

¶22

The petitioners–students, studying in Degree course of B.V.Sc. & A.H. in the College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Parbhani, were suspended under the provisions of section (6)1 of Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1999 by an order dated 10^th May 2012 passed by the Associate Dean, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Parbhani, from residing in the hostel, attending the classes and appearing in the examinations of degree courses.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that, by an application dated 10^th August 2012 signed by the petitioners, addressed to the Associate Dean of the College, the petitioners have expressed their apology and requested for revocation of the suspension order so that their educational career would be saved.

¶24

3 WP 4574 of 2012

¶25

The learned counsel Shri. A.S. Deshpande appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2 submits that the Associate Dean shall forward the representation dated 10^th August 2012 submitted by the petitioners to the Registrar of the respondent–University.

¶26

In the facts of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, we direct the Registrar, Maharashtra Animal & Fish Sciences, Nagpur to pass appropriate orders on the representation in respect of period of suspension of these students within two weeks.

¶27

The writ petition is disposed of. Authenticated copy of the order be provided to the requesting parties. The parties to act on the authenticated copy of the order.

¶28

Sd/- Sd/- (A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)

¶29

rsl

Nikhil Chandrashekhar Deshmukh v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nikhil Chandrashekhar Deshmukh v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Piraji Rangnath Vidhate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S Krishna Oil Co. Jafrabad Vs Collector, Jalna

Chandrabhan Ramdas Raising and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Mohammed Ismail Yakoob Patel Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Pandurang Ashok Ghuge and Ors. Vs the Associate Dean, College of Veterinary and Animal Sci. and Ors.

Deepak Ganpatrao Totawar Vs the State of Mah and Ors.