Appeal from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana involving recriminalisation of aiding sex-selective abortion. The Supreme Court disposed of the matter pending further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp407.11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Writ Petition No. 407 of 2011
( Dr. Mrs. Uma Shankarrao Rachewad V/s Appropriate Authority)
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders
Mr. V.S. Kadam, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for the respondent.
PER COURT:
1. Heard.
2.The judgment dated 19.04.2012
passed by this Court should include the
proviso to sub-section 3 of Section 4 of
thePre-conceptionandPre-natal
Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of
Sex Selection Act), 1994.
3. Motion is disposed of.
11th May, 2012 ( A.V.NIRGUDE, J. )
SGA/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment passed by this Court should include the proviso to sub-section (3) of Section 4 of the 1994 Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Mrs. Uma Shankarrao Rachewad
Appropriate Authority
A.V.Nirgude
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court