his brothers and that they are entitled for specific performance of contract. They also asserted that they have already gone to the Civil Court for obtaining decree of specific performance against respondent no.2 and his brothers. It is further mentioned that since the suit is filed subsequent to the criminal case, they themselves moved an application to the Civil Court and showed their readiness to get the document in question examined through the handwriting expert. They asserted that even for such a bonafide enquiry into the genuineness of the document, respondent no.2 and his brothers opposed. They asserted that the complaint is palpably false and the learned Judge ought not to have passed the order directing investigation and filing of charge sheet. 3. On the face of record, I am not inclined to hold that this complaint could be palpably false one. What is stated in the complaint, is the averment of respondent no.2 and his brothers. They are indeed serious allegations against the petitioners, but they are also taking risk while doing so. If the document is ultimately found genuine, they would lay in serious trouble. The investigation would certainly reveal as to whether the document is genuine or not. Investigating Officer cannot be stopped from sending the document for testing its genuineness etc. Investigating Officer may submit his report either to prosecute the petitioners or to state that the case is false etc. This liberty can not be curtailed by filing Writ Petition of this nature and soliciting order from this Court of stopping investigation or quashing the F.I.R. etc. This would indeed amount to inference in the investigation work. The petitioners are accused and they should cooperate in the investigation. It would be
