Yogesh Chandrakant Bhalerao and Ors. v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cria885.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 885 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1479 OF 2012
(Yogesh Chandrakant Bhalerao & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra &
Anr.)
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE,J.
Registrar's ordersDATED : 19.04.2012
Mr. P.R. Patil h/f. Mr. V.S. Badakh, Advocate
for the applicants.
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, A.P.P. for
respondent/State.
Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.
2.
1.These applications are filed
by the accused for quashment of the
criminal case initiated by respondent
No.2. The applicants are members of
Board of Directors and employees of the
credit society. Respondent No.2/
Complainant is present before the Court
and is identified by his advocate. He
now says that due to misunderstanding
he had lodged the complaint against the
applicants. He said that he does not
2 cria885.12
want to proceed with the case. In view
of this, the prosecution of the
applicant is futile and it would waste
the Court’s time. It is better to put
an end to this case. The case initiated
with the complaint of respondent No.2
stands quashed.
2.Even the applicants agree that
they would not take any punitive action
againstrespondentNo.2,after
conclusion of this case.
3.TheCriminalApplications
stand disposed of.
[A.V. NIRGUDE,J.]
snk/2012/APR12/cria885.12
Yogesh Chandrakant Bhalerao
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court