The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the court on the specified dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP3580-95
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3580/1995
(UNIQUE AGRO PROCESSORS (INDIA) LTD. VERSUS THE KATOL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, KATOL & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 .
None had appeared for the petitioner on 03.09.2012. None appears for the petitioner, today also.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
JUDGE
APTE
Unique Agro Processors (India) Ltd.
The Katol Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Katol
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
