Mere clarification that issues are kept open does not constitute a substantive decision of general application. This order records that no final opinion was expressed on the grounds raised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO. 1002 OF 2012
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA HAND PUMP, VIDYUT PAMP DURUSTI
KARMACHARI SANGHATANA THR. ITS V
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Desale Nilesh N.
Mr.VD Godbharale, AGP for Resp.1 to 4;
Smt. Preeti Diggikar, Adv. for Resp.Nos.5 & 14;
Mr.AB Dhongade, Adv. for Resp.Nos.6 to 8, 17, 25,
30, 31 & 33;
Mr. VR Sonwalkar, Adv. for Resp.No.9;
Mr.DS Bagul, Adv. for Resp.No.10;
Mr.PS Patil, Adv. for Resp.No.11;
Mr.PB Patil, Adv. for Resp.No.12;
Mr.ST Shelke, Adv. for Resp.No.13;
Mr.UB Bondar, Adv. for Resp.Nos.19, 20, 34 & 36;
Mr.SP Brahme, Adv. for Resp.No.15;
Mr.VM Lomte, Adv. for Resp.No.22;
Mr.NL Jadhav, Adv. for Resp.No.23;
Mr.SB Ghatol-Patil, Adv. for Resp.No.24;
Mr.VD Hon, Adv. for Resp.No.26;
Mr.VS Panpatte, Adv. for Resp;No.27; Mr.AB Kharosekar, ADv. for Resp.No.37 .
CORAM: NARESH H.PATIL &
A.B.CHAUDHARI,JJ.
DATE :12th October,2012.
PER COURT :
1)Heard. A motion is made for speaking to
2
Minutes. It is clarified that this Court has not
expressed any final opinion in respect of the grounds
raised in this petition. All issues raised are kept
open. The motion for speaking to Minutes is disposed
of.
(A.B.CHAUDHARI) (NARESH H.PATIL)
JUDGE JUDGE
bdv/
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA HAND PUMP, VIDYUT PAMP DURUSTI KARMACHARI SANGHATANA THR. ITS V
THE STATE OF MAH
NARESH H.PATIL
A.B.CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court