The petition was disposed of by the High Court Bench at Aurangabad on the submission that the relief claimed had become infructuous due to subsequent developments in the matter. All interim applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WP/4506/2012 ,With CA/8033/2012 ,In WP/4506/2012 ,With CA/9550/2012 ,In WP/4506/2012 ,With CA/9019/2012 ,In WP/4506/2012 ,With CA/9020/2012 ,In WP/4506/2012 ,With CA/11150/2012 ,In WP/4506/2012
RAHUL JAGANNATH GOPHANE
VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Gajanan Kadam AGP for Respondents: Mr. R.P.Phatke Advocate for Respondents 6: Dr.Hiraji Gaikwad Advocate for Respondents 9:Mr.G.B.Rajale
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & A. B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. Dated: October 04, 2012
PER COURT :-
( A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. ) ( NARESH H. PATIL, J. )
AGP/-
RAHUL JAGANNATH GOPHANE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
NARESH H. PATIL
A. B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
