COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
Civil Applications for intervention are allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca6904.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6904 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2828 OF 2007
(Bhausaheb Nana Katore vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.)
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7549 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2828 OF 2007
(Gangadhar Bhivaji Chaudhary & ors. vs. State of Maharashtra &
ors.)
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.S.D. Kulkarni Advocate for the
Applicants.
Shri.R.R. Mantri Advocate with Shri. M.N.
Navandar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1
to 9.
Shri.D.J. Khambata, Advocate General with
Shri. S.V. Kurundkar Government Pleader,
Shri. A.B. Patil and Shri. S.K. Tambe
A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
Shri.R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel for
Respondent No.2.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL &
A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.
DATE : 4TH OCTOBER, 2012.
ca6904.12
2
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing
for the respective parties.
2. After considering the submissions
advanced and for the reasons stated in
the Applications, the Civil Applications
for intervention are allowed.
[A.B. CHAUDHARI,J.] [NARESH H.PATIL,J.]
asb/SEPT12
Bhausaheb Nana Katore
Gangadhar Bhivaji Chaudhary
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A.B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court