COURT
PIL allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to raise issues before Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 pil35.12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Public Interest Litigation No.35 of 2012
Janmanch, through its Secretary, Shri Rajeev Gajanan Jagtap Vs. State of Mah. through its Secretary, Department of Energy, (Excluding Non Conventional Energy), Mantralaya, Mumbai.
.............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri A.S.Kilor, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.H.Deshpande, Senior Counsel with Shri A.L.Deshpande, counsel for R-2 & 3. Shri A.A.Naik, counsel for Intervenor. Shri A.M.Quazi, counsel for R-4. Mrs. Bharti Dangre, Addl. GP for R-1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the PIL with liberty to raise all the issues involved in this PIL, before the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission. Thus, we see no impediment in allowing the petitioner to withdraw this PIL.
Accordingly the PIL is allowed to be withdrawn.
The PIL is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
brw
Janmanch
State of Mah.
JUDGE JUDGE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
