The court corrected the court order to allow the petitioner to withdraw the deposit of Rs.50,000/- made in this court, as the initial dictation permitting withdrawal was not reflected in the earlier order.
Direction to the office to carry out necessary correction and permit the petitioner to withdraw Rs.50,000/- deposited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 70 OF 2011 "Bhausaheb Kachru Dube Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others."
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mr. S.G. Bhalearao, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 to 7.
CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :- 23rd FEBRUARY, 2012.
PER COURT :-
1] Production permitted.
2] Learned counsel for the petitioner states that though while dictating the order, this court had dictated that the amount deposited by the petitioner in this court is permitted to be withdrawn, the same is not reflected in the order.
3] The contention appears to be correct. Necessary correction be carried out. Petitioner be permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.50,000/- deposited by him in this court.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]
grt/-
Bhausaheb Kachru Dube
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
