Asaram Ravji Sathe v. Secretary Office of the Governer Mumbai and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Writ Petition No. 815 of 2012, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad, held that the petitioner had an alternate efficacious remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Consequently, the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was not entertained and was rejected as it was not a fit case for the writ jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.
What did the court decide?
Petition is rejected, relegating the petitioner to alternate remedy available to him in law.