The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition. The court held that the relief cannot be granted in view of the law laid down by this Court in Rajendra Pandurang Pagare.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 1376/12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1376/2012 Raj Altas Papulal Jadhav (Naik) V/s The State of Maharashtra.
|
Office Notes, Office
||_______________
|
|---|---|
|Memoranda of Coram,
|
appearances, Court's
||
Court's or Judge's orders
|
|orders or directions
|||
|and Registrar's orders
|||
Shri R.R. Sancheti, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent.
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
Date: 15.02.2012
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the law laid down by the Full
Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Pandurang Pagare & another V/s State of Maharashtra & others reported at 2009 (4) Mh.L.J., 961 , the relief prayed in the petition cannot be granted. Hence, the petition is rejected.
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 15.02.2012 ndk/c1521211
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajendra Pandurang Pagare & another V/s State of Maharashtra & othersFollowed¶10
2009 (4) Mh.L.J., 961 · Who else cites this
Raj Altas Papulal Jadhav (Naik)
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
