Petitioner seeks direction for prevention of milk adulteration. Court discretionarily directs State to consider representations within three months.
Directed State to consider petitioner's representations on milk adulteration within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.42 OF 2011 "Doodh Utpadak Kalyankari Sangh Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others."
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mr. Girish Nik Thigle, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondents.
CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 15th FEBRUARY, 2012.
PER COURT :-
1] The learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his claim in the petition for a direction to the State Government to consider the representations made by the petitioners for taking steps for prevention of adulteration of milk.
2] Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent State to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within 3 months from today.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]
grt/-
Doodh Utpadak Kalyankari Sangh
The State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
