Disposed
Laffans Petrochemicals Ltd. and Anr. v. Huntsman Investments (Netherland) B.V. and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCAPP/37/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO. 751 OF 2011 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 754 OF 2011
Laffans Petrochemicals Ltd. and Anr.
... Appellants
Versus
Huntsman Investments (Netherland) B.V. & Ors. ... Respondents
Smt. Vandana Mehta i/by Mr. Yashpal Jain for the appellants.
Smt. Devika Deshmukh i/by M/s. Bharucha & Partners for the respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT SHAH, C.J. AND SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : JANUARY 10, 2012
P.C.
Para 1 of our order dated 23rd December, 2011 is substituted by
following paragraph as set out in para 2 of the precipe :
'The learned Counsel for appellants and the learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 have placed on record the consent terms dated 23 December 2011 signed by authorised signatory for Appellant no. 1 and constituted Attorney of Appellant no. 2 as well as by Director of respondent no. 2, in his capacity as the authorised representative of Respondent nos. 1 and 2 and by the
Advocates for the respective parties."
The original order stands corrected accordingly. Precipe stands
disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(SMT.ROSHAN DALVI,J.)
Laffans Petrochemicals Ltd. and Anr.
Huntsman Investments (Netherland) B.V. & Ors.
Mohit Shah
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court