Allowed
Sarang David Gaikwad v. the Official Liquidator of M/S. Navinon Ltd.
Bombay HCCA/586/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.H.HADAP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO.586 OF 2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.1176 OF 2001
Sarang David Gaikwad V/s
The Official Liquidator of M/s.Navinon Ltd.
.. Applicant
.. Respondent
Mr.Mahendra Agavekar i/by Mr.S.S.Ranade for Applicant. Ms.Rupa Sutar, Asstt.Official Liquidator present.
CORAM: N.M.JAMDAR, J. DATE : 22nd November, 2012
P.C.:
The reason given in paragraph 4 of the application filed by the applicant having been found to be a sufficient cause, delay in lodging the claim is condoned. Company application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(N.M.JAMDAR, J.)
1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarang David Gaikwad
The Official Liquidator of M/s.Navinon Ltd.
N.M.JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court