In an arbitration petition, the High Court recorded amicable settlement terms submitted by the petitioner and respondent and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ArBP1003-09
Mlns
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1003 OF 2009
Mrs.Shilpa Rajan Bhagudia. … Petitioner Vs. Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd & anr. … Respondents
Mr.Rajeev Kumar, for petitioner.
Ms.Deepika Motagi i/b S.Y.Amare & Deepali V.Chavn, for respondent No.1.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR J. Wednesday, 21 November, 2012.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the petitioner and respondent No.1 have arrived at an amicable settlement. Respondent No.2 is an arbitrator who has not appeared in the petition, in that sense he is a formal party. The learned counsel request that the consent terms which have been signed by the parties and also signed by the advocates for identification be taken on record .
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Mrs. Shilpa Rajan Bhagudia
Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
