The court refused to grant bail but directed the expedited trial of the Sessions Case within two months for the ends of justice.
Trial of Sessions Case to be completed within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cri.Appl.No.46 of 2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.46 OF 2012 (Sadanand Dadaraol Jogdand versus The State of Maharashtra)
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s Orders |
|---|---|
| Mr.S.S.Jadhav, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.D.R.Kale, learned A.P.P. for respondent/State. |
|
| CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J. DATE : 06/02/2012 |
|
| 1. Heard. | |
| 2. Perused the case diary. | |
| 3. This court is not inclined to grant bail, however ends of justice shall meet if trial is expedited. 4. This court therefore directs that Sessions Case No.42/2012 be completed within 2 months of receipt of writ of this order. |
|
| (A.H.JOSHI, J.) khs/Feb. 2012/cri.appl.46-12 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in the pending criminal trial.
Sadanand Dadaraol Jogdand
The State of Maharashtra
A.H.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
