This judgment dismissed a criminal bail application held to be frivolous. The court observed that incriminating circumstances were proven by two witness statements, and the case relied on circumstantial evidence showing the applicant's prima facie involvement. Consequently, no case for bail was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crap178.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 178 OF 2012 [Rahul Punja Rahane vs The State of Maharashtra]
_________________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office |
Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders or |
directions and |
Registrar's orders |
Shri V.Y.Bhide, advocate for the applicant
Shri D.R.Kale, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.
DATED : 06.02.2012.
PER COURT:-
police, namely Anita Kailas Rahane and Lahu Bhaga Ghule, in specific words proved incriminating circumstances. The case is based on circumstantial evidence and the circumstances prima facie show the involvement of the accused, and therefore, the applicant has no case for bail.
(A.H.JOSHI, J.)
dbm/crap178.12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal bail application under Section 439 CrPC should be allowed or dismissed.
Rahul Punja Rahane
The State of Maharashtra
A.H.Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court