Criminal applicant charged under Sections 399, 402, 34 IPC. Court found no special features or preparation for offence demonstrated. Application allowed granting personal bail and one surety.
Personal bail and one solvent surety in a sum of Rs. 15,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crap192.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 192 OF 2012
[Bangalsingh Ratansingh Chavan vs The State of Maharashtra]
_________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.R.Bagal, advocate for the applicant
Shri R.P.Phatke, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.
DATED : 06.02.2012.
PER COURT :-
2
crap192.12
nothing special worth the name liable to be described as preparation
of offence, is demonstrated.
(A.H.JOSHI, J.)
dbm/crap192.12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether special preparation for the offence under Sections 399 and 402 IPC is demonstrated to deny bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bangalsingh Ratansingh Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
A.H.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court