As per court in Criminal Application No. 164/2012, the court noted the evidence regarding dowry demands and the alleged abetment of suicide was hearsay and absent respectively. Consequently, the bail application was allowed.
Bail bond and surety bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 to be executed as per prayer clause 'C'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crap164.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2012 [Ashok s/o Subhash Shinde and ors. vs The State of Maharashtra]
_________________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office |
Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders or |
directions and |
Registrar's orders |
Shri G.G.Kadam, advocate for the applicants
Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.
DATED : 06.02.2012.
PER COURT :-
2
crap164.12
bail bond and surety bond shall be in the sum of Rs.10,000/-.
(A.H.JOSHI, J.)
dbm/crap164.12
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for bail should be granted given the nature of evidence regarding dowry demands and alleged abetment of suicide.
What conditions, if any, should apply to the grant of bail in this case.
Whether the alleged evidence is merely hearsay and lacks corroboration as claimed by the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok
Subhash Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
A.H.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court