Allowed

Soni Suresh Randive v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Oct 2011WP/984/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order concerns a writ petition for compassionate appointment, which the court held was not maintainable in this forum, directing the petitioner to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal before withdrawing.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file an Original Application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

Soni Suresh Randive Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2011)

¶1

¶2

 WP984.11

¶3

Bsb

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 984 OF 2011

¶6

Smt.Soni Suresh Randive

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

v/s

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

Ms.Tejasweeta Kadam i/by Rahul S. Kate for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Vagyani, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.

¶12

CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.

¶13

DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2011

¶14

P.C.:

¶15

The grievance raised in this petition is for compassionate appointment under respondent No.3 and, therefore, at the first instance, the petitioner will have to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a Original Application before the Tribunal.

¶16

¶17

 WP984.11

¶18

Hence, the petition is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to file a Original Application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

¶19

(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)

¶20

¶21

 WP984.11

Soni Suresh Randive v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Soni Suresh Randive v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Vs Hemlata Ghanshyam Briha

Shri Makarand Bhimrao Patil Vs the Collector of Pune and Ors.

Gangadhar v. Kayande Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kalpavruksha Pratisthan'S Narendra Hindi School (Secondary Scool) through Secretary / Treasurer Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, School Education Dept, Mumbai and Ors.

Smt. Rakhi Ravindra Raskar Alias Ms. Rekha Dhanraj Pankar Vs Chief Education Officer, School Board, Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Shri. Fattesinh Nanasaheb Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra through Additional Chief Secretary, Home Dept and Ors.