The State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. Hemlata Ghanshyam Briha
Case brief
What is this about?
Two writ petitions were heard and summarily rejected without detailed reasoning, as they were previously rejected in WP No. 3276 of 2011.
Two writ petitions were heard and summarily rejected without detailed reasoning, as they were previously rejected in WP No. 3276 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.7742.2011+
: 1 :
vss
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7742 OF 2011 a/w WRIT PETITION NO.7979 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's Orders order or Directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr.A.B. Vagyani, AGP, for Petitioners
CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 18, 2011
Heard. For the reasons set out in our common order passed in Writ Petition No.3276 of 2011 alongwith other connected matters on 1st August, 2011, these petitions are also rejected.
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)
B.H. MARLAPALLE
NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court