The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an interim transfer order. The Court found no reason to interfere as the tribunal would address the legality of transfers under the Transfer Act.
The writ petition challenging the interim transfer order is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP8615.11
Bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8615 OF 2011
Shri Fattesinh Nanasaheb Patil
... Petitioner
v/s
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
... Respondents
Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the petitioner.
Ms.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 to 4.
Mr.M.D.Lonkar with Miss S.P.Manchekar for Resp.No.5.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2011
P.C.:
2
WP8615.11
Station and consequently the petitioner was transferred on the same day in place of the original applicant.
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)
3
WP8615.11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the interim transfer order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
Shri Fattesinh Nanasaheb Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Unknown Respondent No. 5
B.H. Marlapalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court