This court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner has an alternative remedy via a revision application before the Divisional Commissioner, allowing liberty to file such an application.
Petition disposed off with liberty to file a revision application before the Divisional Commissioner, Pune.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
wp.8534.2011
vss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8534 OF 2011
Shri Makarand Bhimrao Patil
.. Petitioner
V/s.
The Collector of Pune & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr.Shekhar Jagtap for the Petitioner Ms.S.S. Bhende, AGP, for the Respondent State
CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 18, 2011
P.C.:
the impugned order dated 3.9.2011 of filing a revision application before the Divisional Commissioner and the law laid down by this Court could be cited in the revision application as well.
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
Shri Makarand Bhimrao Patil
The Collector of Pune & Ors.
B.H. Marlappalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
