Disposed
Navin Raju Shettiyar v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/11/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PPD
1
18.WP.11-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.11 OF 2011
Mr.Navin Raju Shettiyar. ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra and another. .. Respondents.
Mr.Khan Abdul Wahab, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Seema Rawade, Advocate for the Respondent No.2B.M.C.. Mr.P.A. Pol, Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND
A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 05TH JANUARY, 2011.
P.C.
the Petitioner is willing to pay the deficit octroi duty forthwith and
would undertake to pay the penalty amount as and when demanded, after complying with the formalities as referred to in the decision of the Division Bench of our High Court in the case of Sushmita Sen Vs.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr. . reported in
2008(2) Mh.L.J. Page42 .
2
18.WP.11-11
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sushmita Sen Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.Referred¶13
Sushmita Sen Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
Navin Raju Shettiyar
State of Maharashtra
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
A. M. Khanwilkar
A. R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court