In a criminal contempt petition, the Court was informed that the matter was amicably settled and the petitioner no longer wished to prosecute the remedy. The petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 conp797
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 7 OF 1997
Dwarkanath Sobnath Mishra ...Petitioner
V/s.
Dhirubhai Maneklal Mehta & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Gaurang Shah i/by Mr. N.V. Vimadalal for the Petitioner Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P., for the State.
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 5TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C.:-
The counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that the matter has been amicably settled between the private parties, and it has been agreed between them that the petitioner will not pursue the present contempt action. In the circumstances, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this remedy any further.
we called upon the counsel for the petitioner to re-construct the record.
2 conp797
He submits that even his papers have been taken away by his client. Even so, he may take necessary steps in that behalf.
petitioner.
A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Dwarkanath Sobnath Mishra
Dhirubhai Maneklal Mehta & Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
