This order dismisses the criminal application because the applicant did not appear despite a previous order and is considered not to be pursuing the appeal.
Application dismissed; private paper-book submission permitted if intending to pursue appeal expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
823.09
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.823 OF 2009 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.597 OF 2009
Shrimant Pundalik Dudhal ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
None for Applicant.
Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ.
DATED:- JANUARY 5, 2011.
P.C.
does not survive for consideration. Besides, none appears for the Applicant when the matter is called out. Accordingly, Application is dismissed. It will
be open to the Applicant to submit private paper-book if he intends to
pursue the appeal expeditiously in terms of order dated December 9, 2010.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Shrimant Pundalik Dudhal
State of Maharashtra
A.M.KHANWILKAR
A.R.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
