The court directed the office to consign the papers to the record as the petition was not pressed and was allegedly disposed of in the past.
Direction to office to consign the papers to the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
conp496
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 4 OF 1996
Naz Asif Patel ...Petitioner
V/s.
P.K. Kotkar & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. D.R. More for the Petitioner
Ms. S.V. Gajare, A.P.P., for the State.
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 5TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C.:-
The counsel for the petitioner submits that, as per his recollection, the petition is already disposed of long back, as it was not pressed by the petitioner. He submits that the matter was placed for hearing before the Bench of Mr. Justice A.P. Shah and Mr. Justice
S.S. Parkar.
A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Naz Asif Patel
P.K. Kotkar & Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
