Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The Court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, rendering the quashing prayer untenable. The petition was disposed of with liberty to seek other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
108.11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.108 OF 2011
Meddison System India Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Madhav Jamdar with Mr.Abhijeet Rane for Petitioners.
Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 22, 2011.
P.C.
may be permissible by law.
108.11
2
to other remedies.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Meddison System India Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
