The Court disposed of the fifth bail application, granting liberty to renew the prayer if the appeal does not reach for hearing by December 2011, noting the applicant had served nearly 9 years and 8 months.
Application disposed; liberty granted to applicant to renew prayer for bail if appeal not heard by end of December 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
41.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.343 OF 2004
Vahidali Abdulgani Chuhe ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.R.Y.Mirza i/b Mr.Javed Hussein for Applicant.
Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 21, 2011.
P.C.
time, it is confined to the ground that the applicant has substantially undergone sentence period and that the appeal is unlikely to be taken up for hearing in near future. Since the applicant has undergone actual sentence only of 9 years 7 months and 14 days as of now, as is stated by the learned A.P.P., we dispose of this Application with liberty to the applicant to renew the prayer for bail, in the event, the appeal does not reach for hearing by
end of December, 2011.
2
41.11
board.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail shall be granted to the applicant who has substantially undergone his sentence period pending appeal hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vahidali Abdulgani Chuhe
The State of Maharashtra
A.M.Khanwilkar
A.R.Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
