The High Court disposed of a second bail application by the applicant. Since the applicant had already undergone a sentence period of 9 years and 10 months, the court granted some liberty without final order.
Disposed with liberty to renew the prayer for bail if the appeal is not heard by December 31, 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
114.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.114 OF 2011
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.982 OF 2006
Yadayya Pushayya Kadamanchi ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.Nitin Sejpal for Applicant.
Mr.Y.S.Shinde, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 21, 2011.
P.C.
stated by the learned A.P.P., we dispose of this Application with liberty to the applicant to renew the prayer for bail, in the event, the appeal does not reach for hearing by end of December, 2011.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Yadayya Pushayya Kadamanchi
The State of Maharashtra
A.M.KHANWILKAR
A.R.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
