The Principal Rammata Ambedkar Adhyapika Vidyalaya v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
WRIT PETITION NO.: 6460 OF 2007
***
1.Learned Mr. M P. Gude for the
Petitioner. None for Respondent No.2.
Learned A.G.P. Mr. Tele is present on behalf
of Respondent/ State. He points out
communication/ letter impugned in this writ
petition. With his assistance, we have seen
the communication addressed to all Principals
by the Commissioner of Maharashtra State
Examination Council, Pune. Learned A.G.P. is
justified in contending that the petition has
become infructuous by efflux of time.
2.Writ petition stands dismissed being
infructuous. No costs. Interim relief, if
any, stands vacated.
[SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]
Dated:13/10/2010.
ans/6460
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition which had become infructuous by efflux of time should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State of Maharashtra
SHRIHARI P.DAVARE
S.B.DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court