Dismissed
Ghudaling Raghunathrao Pawle and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/5254/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5254 OF 2001
Ghudaling s/o Raghunathrao Pawale & ors.
...Petitioners
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Shri P.K.Joshi, advocate for the petitioners Shri S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Shri V.J.Panpatte, advocate for respondent no.3 Shri D.B.Bhange, advocate for respondent no.4
CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH
AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ.
DATED : 12th October, 2010
PER COURT :
None appears for the petitioners and the respondents, except learned A.G.P. Shri S.K.Kadam.
We have seen prayer clauses in the Writ Petition. We have seen the order passed by this court on 7th September, 2010. It appears that the petitioners have lost their interest in the petition.
Writ Petition, therefore, stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. Rule discharged. No costs.
dbm/wp5254.01
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.)
Ghudaling s/o Raghunathrao Pawale & ors.
The State of Maharashtra and others
Desmukh S. B.
Davare S. H.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court