Sanjay Bhaskar Satam v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate relief from competent forum. No examination of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
T
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.Nitin Pradhan, Advocate i/b Ms Ameeta Kuttikrishnan, for the petitioner. Mrs. A.S.Pai, APP, for the respondentState.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND A.R.JOSH, JJ. DATE : 28/04/2010
PC:
Heard Mr Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs Pai, learned APP for the State.
Mr Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate legal action/steps for redressal of his grievance before the appropriate forum. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
While granting liberty, we
2
shall not be understood to have examined the merits of the case.
(A.R.JOSHI , J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)
3
Nitin Pradhan
Respondent State
D.B. Bhosale
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court