The corpus includes an order in a writ petition regarding an inquiry pending against the petitioner. The respondent undertook to complete the inquiry within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.2643 OF 2010
(SURESH R. BORKAR..VS.. THE MAHARASHTRA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, PUNE.)
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 01, 2010.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused petition.
Mr. Saboo, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation makes a statement that within a period of three months the enquiry will be completed.
The statement made in this behalf is taken on record. The petitioner is expected to co-operate with the Enquiry Officer. He shall not seek any adjournment unless any exigency.
In view of above, the petition stands disposed of, keeping all rival contentions open. No order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
RR..
Suresh R. Borkar
The Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, Pune
V.C.Daga
A.B.Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
